This month represents 2 years since I made my clean break from religion. To mark the occasion, I’ve decided to explore how I was de-converted. The problem is, the people this is written to will probably not read it. I am writing this, not for my closest friends, who accept me for who I am, but for those who think that I left religion frivolously. These people believe that I left because I wanted to live a life I couldn’t while being LDS or that I simply fell into the wrong crowd. They also believe that it will take something just as frivolous to bring me back. The phrase I hear directly and indirectly is, “All you need is a good Mormon girl to bring you back.” If you are one of these people please read on because I hope to demonstrate that my de-conversion was a long process which didn’t happen overnight, in fact it took years.
As far as my stance on life, the universe and everything, I am an agnostic atheist. I believe there is no god, but I can’t prove one doesn’t exist. However, when I started doubting my faith I couldn’t foresee I would end at that conclusion.
A little bit of background, I grew up in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, and was homeschooled from the 3rd grade through high school. A little on my homeschooling, my parents weren’t very ‘hands on.’ Anything I learned I mostly taught myself through reading, exploration and watching liberal amounts science shows on TV, like Bill Nye the Science Guy. What this did for me was give me a very curious nature. I wanted to know more about many subjects, which helped lead to my fall. I also never was in a position where I was just accepting of what I was taught.
I started having doubts about my religion when I was 16. I started seeing inconsistencies in the church like, old doctrines the church had rejected that they now glossed over. An example was not allowing African-Americans to receive the priesthood or go to the temple for a long time. That was rejected and now you never hear about it, and it’s glossed over if you bring it up. Along with it I started learning about other translations of the Bible. I had a hard time seeing the problem with using different translations of the Bible, especially if they were easier to understand. The reasoning, I was told, was there was deeper meaning in the old english the King James Version was written in. So there are some starting seeds of doubt, at this point my faith still pretty strong, but I have curiosity both in what other versions of the Bible say and what are some other ‘deep doctrine’ that is no longer taught.
When I entered my 3rd year of seminary I had completed studying the whole Bible and moved onto the Book of Mormon. This is where I learned why the church really uses the King James Version elusively. It’s because several parts of the Book of Mormon quote the King James Bible. As I researched though I found that the King James Bible wasn’t translated correctly, and thought that might spill over into the Book of Mormon. But we were taught that while there were translation errors in the Bible, the Book of Mormon was the inerrant word of God. In fact the 8th article of faith reads, “We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly; we also believe the Book of Mormon to be the word of God.” This was the first major blow for me, how could something that was translated wrong be correct if it was quoted in the other?
As I entered my final year of seminary I had put most of my previous questions in the back of my mind, but as we started learning about Doctrine & Covenants and church history I was struck at how some of the stories were twisted to give a specific view. My favorite is of the Book of Lehi, where Martin Harris takes the translated manuscript to his wife and she steals it and tells Harris that if Joseph Smith can re-translate it word for word then it would be proof that he was telling the truth. In the church the story goes that God was mad at Joseph Smith because he had begged God to let Martin Harris take the manuscript, despite saying no many times, and commanded him to move on and that those pages wouldn’t be re-translated. To me that story seemed more then just a little fishy.
The other story which was similar was taking the golden plates and the translated manuscript to have it authenticated. I don’t remember the characters names, but it goes like this. Someone took the plates and the manuscript to an expert in ancient languages to verify it was authentic. The scholar looked at the translation, was amazed at how accurate it was and signed a certificate of authenticity. When he asked whoever brought them how they were translated, then man said, by angels of God. Then, according to the story, the scholar ripped up the certificate, threw it out and said something to the affect that, “God no longer converses with man.”
The thing these stories have in common is, when verifiable evidence of the validity of these stories is given, the story comes up with a reason why it was take away. While someone who accepts the stories when told by an authority figure would believe them, I didn’t.
As time went on I took some institute classes in Anchorage, and while the social interaction was nice, I still couldn’t get those lingering problems out of my head. Eventually my family and I moved to Idaho when I was 19 and I stopped going to church from 19-21.
At 21 I decided to give the LDS church 1 more shot. It was great while it lasted, mostly for the social interactions. I met people, made friends and had fun, but all the fun in the world couldn’t quell the nagging feeling I had that there was so much not quite right about everything, the doctrines, the stories, everything. Also as I was going to college I was finding I was agreeing with ideas I had picked up there, and learning more about history both in the church and in general that further invalidated what I was taught in church and institute. Evolution is a great example. The story that humans started off black and in Africa invalidated the story of Adam and Eve being white and black skin came later as a curse on Cain and his decedents for murdering his brother Able.
In November of 2007, when I was 22, almost 23, I decided I needed to look at other religions. I look at different Christian sects, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism and others. I did a lot of research and what I found going over all the religions, they all (except Buddhism) believed in a god or gods, and going back and looking at Egyptian and Norse gods, gods most of modern society has rejected, that the likeliness of the Judeo-Christian God, the Hindu Gods, the Egyptian Gods and the Norse Gods were about as likely to exist.
Going back to my curiosity in science, this is when it really struck me that God was beyond science. I had no way to verify that the god I believed in was any more or less valid than any other. This sparked the question, “Why would God let all these false gods exist without revealing himself?” All these religions claimed to have members who experienced mystical events to validate their god so my personal feelings toward this one god made it an invalid test (it wasn’t until later that I learned the problems of anecdotal evidence).
As I thought about it more and more I came to THE question, “Is there a god?”
This question sent my brain into a panic. I had many restless nights trying to get over it and spent a lot of time and energy trying to convince myself that there was. As I look back, I find that at this point, part of me already knew that I no longer believed, but the other part wasn’t ready to accept it.
At this point I hope there is 1 specific person that is still reading. You see before I left, and really through this whole process, I didn’t give any hint I was having any spiritual problems to my church leaders. One person has always wondered if they had missed any signs and I will say they did, but it’s very devious. You see the only hint was the one that seemed to show I had an extremely strong faith. When I would get up once a month and bare my testimony, I would attribute an event to God. This wasn’t me being strong in the church, this was me trying very, very hard to reboot my belief process. I don’t say this to mock you, if you’re still reading 1,400 words later, but just to make you aware.
Anyway by the time April 2008 came around I had accepted that I had lost my faith. Not only that, I was excited I was finally able to accept it, however, on the advice of some friends I decided to keep going to church for the time being. At that point I had started forming secular ideas for things I had always attributed to faith and scripture, things such as service, kindness and all around altruism. While in this transition phase, I was asked to give a talk on service. What was funny was that I gave a completely secular message, that we shouldn’t just serve fellow man because we will receive blessings. I wish I still had that talk, because hindsight says it was an important point for me.
About 2 weeks after that I went and told my bishop I was done. I didn’t believe it anymore, and I haven’t been back since, except to hear my sister sing in church for Christmas Sunday.
To close I want to make a point that I came to this conclusion on my own. I knew atheists and agnostics during this process, but they were kind and didn’t push me in any direction. They were a sounding board when I needed one and always checked if they were going too far, but they never pushed me in any direction and if I were still Mormon they would accept me, which is more than I can say about some of my old Mormon friends (bu not all, mind you). I appreciate them for being their to hear me when I was afraid to talk to anyone else. Also I didn’t read any atheist books or websites before coming to this conclusion.
If you wonder how I could no longer believe in a god, I refer to a quote by Stephen F. Roberts posting to the alt.atheism newsgroup, “I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.”
If that is too much to comprehend, think about believing in Santa Clause. You may be offended by the reference, but it’s applicable. Do you still believe in Santa Clause?
Now take the Santa Clause statement and apply that to believing again. I don’t think I could ever believe in a god again just like I could never believe in Santa Clause again. Could you believe in Santa Clause again?
This has been an extremely long post, but hopefully it gives some insight into how I left.
I would like to point out there were other problems I had with the LDS church and religion in general. I only touched briefly on some of the major points, so if you have any inkling that these could all be answered easily, then you’re wrong. You’re welcome to try, I have an open door policy on listening, but it doesn’t mean it’ll convince me I’m wrong. I have half a mind to go into why, but since this post is already over 2,000 words (longer then either of my final papers this last semester) I’ll save it for another post.